summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFlorian Dold <florian.dold@gmail.com>2019-07-17 23:38:47 +0200
committerFlorian Dold <florian.dold@gmail.com>2019-07-17 23:38:47 +0200
commite8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903 (patch)
treead025ba39ac65120d5b529db7425871a0d380fc4
parent74d9811967bfdc526ff132dfc4722f06ea1c5769 (diff)
downloadmarketing-e8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903.tar.gz
marketing-e8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903.tar.bz2
marketing-e8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903.zip
payto: provisional for now, FCFS with strong advice
-rw-r--r--standards/draft-dold-payto.xml9
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml b/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml
index 3284dd2..2af805e 100644
--- a/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml
+++ b/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
</address>
</author>
- <date day="17" month="April" year="2019" />
+ <date day="17" month="July" year="2019" />
<!-- Meta-data Declarations -->
<area>General</area>
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ essential for an application to conduct a payment.
The "payto" URI scheme is already registered in the "Provisional URI Schemes" registry.
<list style="empty">
<t>Scheme name: payto</t>
-<t>Status: permanent</t>
+<t>Status: provisional</t>
<t>URI scheme syntax: See <xref target="syntax" />.</t>
<t>URI scheme semantics: See <xref target="semantics" />.</t>
<t>Applications/protocols that use this scheme name: payto URIs are mainly used by financial software,
@@ -269,10 +269,9 @@ dots and dashes)</t>
<t>References: Optionally, references describing the payment method (such as an RFC) and method-specific options,
or references describing the payment system underlying the payment target type.</t>
</list>
-The registration policy for this registry is "expert review", as described in <xref target="RFC5226" />.
-The expert is appointed by the IETF Indenpendent Stream Editor.
+ The registration policy for this registry is "First Come First Served", as described in <xref target="RFC5226" />.
-The expert's review SHOULD consider the following criteria:
+When requesting new entries, careful consideration of the following criteria is strongly advised:
<list style="numbers">
<t>The proposed registry entry contains all mandatory information.</t>
<t>The description clearly defines the syntax and semantics of the payment target and optional parameters if applicable.</t>