diff options
author | Florian Dold <florian.dold@gmail.com> | 2019-07-17 23:38:47 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Florian Dold <florian.dold@gmail.com> | 2019-07-17 23:38:47 +0200 |
commit | e8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903 (patch) | |
tree | ad025ba39ac65120d5b529db7425871a0d380fc4 | |
parent | 74d9811967bfdc526ff132dfc4722f06ea1c5769 (diff) | |
download | marketing-e8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903.tar.gz marketing-e8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903.tar.bz2 marketing-e8a4e856b55affe8e42bc018fdb341a1e368c903.zip |
payto: provisional for now, FCFS with strong advice
-rw-r--r-- | standards/draft-dold-payto.xml | 9 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml b/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml index 3284dd2..2af805e 100644 --- a/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml +++ b/standards/draft-dold-payto.xml @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ </address> </author> - <date day="17" month="April" year="2019" /> + <date day="17" month="July" year="2019" /> <!-- Meta-data Declarations --> <area>General</area> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ essential for an application to conduct a payment. The "payto" URI scheme is already registered in the "Provisional URI Schemes" registry. <list style="empty"> <t>Scheme name: payto</t> -<t>Status: permanent</t> +<t>Status: provisional</t> <t>URI scheme syntax: See <xref target="syntax" />.</t> <t>URI scheme semantics: See <xref target="semantics" />.</t> <t>Applications/protocols that use this scheme name: payto URIs are mainly used by financial software, @@ -269,10 +269,9 @@ dots and dashes)</t> <t>References: Optionally, references describing the payment method (such as an RFC) and method-specific options, or references describing the payment system underlying the payment target type.</t> </list> -The registration policy for this registry is "expert review", as described in <xref target="RFC5226" />. -The expert is appointed by the IETF Indenpendent Stream Editor. + The registration policy for this registry is "First Come First Served", as described in <xref target="RFC5226" />. -The expert's review SHOULD consider the following criteria: +When requesting new entries, careful consideration of the following criteria is strongly advised: <list style="numbers"> <t>The proposed registry entry contains all mandatory information.</t> <t>The description clearly defines the syntax and semantics of the payment target and optional parameters if applicable.</t> |