From b496b8fed5bcef74e79bad7351cab98aae6a7dd7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Grothoff Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 17:51:27 +0200 Subject: add more flexibility to endpoint naming for KYC --- src/testing/test_exchange_api.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/testing/test_exchange_api.c') diff --git a/src/testing/test_exchange_api.c b/src/testing/test_exchange_api.c index 4f1e2a611..da4974f28 100644 --- a/src/testing/test_exchange_api.c +++ b/src/testing/test_exchange_api.c @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ run (void *cls, /* Try resolving a deposit's WTID, as we never triggered * execution of transactions, the answer should be that * the exchange knows about the deposit, but has no WTID yet. - */// + */ TALER_TESTING_cmd_track_transaction ("deposit-wtid-found", "deposit-simple", 0, @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ run (void *cls, * happen here, as each deposit operation is run with a * fresh merchant public key, so the aggregator will treat * them as "different" merchants and do the wire transfers - * individually. */// + * individually. */ CMD_EXEC_AGGREGATOR ("run-aggregator"), /** * Check all the transfers took place. -- cgit v1.2.3