From 5106a09c9fff809ff502a267759f5f72401c1065 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Grothoff Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 23:53:52 +0200 Subject: fix more typos --- doc/paper/taler.tex | 2 +- doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/paper') diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex index 45eeacdf5..b462a4d69 100644 --- a/doc/paper/taler.tex +++ b/doc/paper/taler.tex @@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ and another time for refunding the remaining amount without losing anonymity. Unfortunately this approach cannot be used for a general-purpose payment system, since the refund operation of Rupp et al. allows transferring money in a way that hides income from taxation. Refunding a coin into a wallet that -didn't withdraw the coin is possible in their system, but consitutes a +didn't withdraw the coin is possible in their system, but constitutes a transaction between two parties that is not recognized by the system for the purpose of income taxation. diff --git a/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt b/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt index f66530c68..40070be48 100644 --- a/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt +++ b/doc/paper/taler_FC2017.txt @@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ Specific comments: > We added remarks on the level of anonymity that Zerocash achieves. > We suspect Zerocash's inherent scaling issues limit its anonymity -> for normal purchases, as compaired to that a large Taler exchange +> for normal purchases, as compared to that a large Taler exchange > provides. We mention that Zerocash is likely to provide better > anonymtiy for large transactions that do not need to be cashed out. -- cgit v1.2.3