From 2e2dee1b0c0fc970f47bab510a1ecb5088ffa47e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffrey Burdges Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 21:38:13 +0200 Subject: Parenthetical comments --- doc/paper/taler.tex | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/paper') diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex index 47a17ccd5..997e4097b 100644 --- a/doc/paper/taler.tex +++ b/doc/paper/taler.tex @@ -1428,8 +1428,8 @@ information known by the merchant in the above. As a result, this proves that our linking protocol \S\ref{subsec:linking} does not degrade privacy. We note that the exchange could lie in the linking protocol about the transfer public key to generate coins that it can -link (at a financial loss to the exchange that it would have to share -with its auditor). However, in the normal course of payments the link +link, at a financial loss to the exchange that it would have to share +with its auditor. However, in the normal course of payments the link protocol is never used. \subsection{Exculpability arguments} @@ -1614,9 +1614,9 @@ we then pushed the t2.micro instance to the resource limit from a network with $\approx$ 160 ms latency to the EC2 instance. At that point, the instance managed about 8 HTTP requests per second, which roughly corresponds to one full business -transaction (as a full business transaction is expected to involve -withdrawing and depositing several coins). The network traffic was -modest at approximately 50 kbit/sec from the exchange +transaction, given that a full business transaction is expected to +involve withdrawing and depositing several coins. The network traffic +was modest at approximately 50 kbit/sec from the exchange %(Figure~\ref{fig:out}) and 160 kbit/sec to the exchange. %(Figure~\ref{fig:in}). -- cgit v1.2.3