From 998858bc8f95eb1966e3edacb6583c5af4dd46d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeffrey Burdges <burdges@gnunet.org>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 14:55:48 +0200
Subject: Be a bit more honest about Zerocash by using the word "can".

---
 doc/paper/taler.tex | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'doc/paper/taler.tex')

diff --git a/doc/paper/taler.tex b/doc/paper/taler.tex
index 8c17a284f..5e8f03921 100644
--- a/doc/paper/taler.tex
+++ b/doc/paper/taler.tex
@@ -309,9 +309,10 @@ sender and receiver, giving it a larger anonymity set than Taler under
 equal usage levels.  A Taler exchange can process transactions many
 orders of magnitude faster and more cheaply than any blockchain-based
 cryptocurrency like Zerocash.  It follows that, assuming reasonable
-adoption levels for both, Taler will yield stronger anonymity for
-ordinary purchases, although Zerocash should retain an advantage for
-large transactions that never get cashed out into another currency.
+adoption levels for both, Taler can yield stronger anonymity for
+ordinary purchases, although this depends upon adoption.
+Also, Zerocash should retain an advantage for large transactions that
+never get cashed out into another currency.
 In addition, Zerocash's anonymity for the receiver facilitates illegal
 activities like extortion, money laundering, and tax evasion.
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

