From 37cb14044906cb5cff65b0c462e9e4311e708b8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 21:09:36 -0500 Subject: hopefully uncontroversial style nit: s/organisations/organizations/ I saw elsewhere there is "honor", so assume we lean to American English. However, i also note that "i.e." and "e.g." are often not followed by comma, which is more British English. Probably we need to choose one or the other. --- libeufin/iso20022.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'libeufin') diff --git a/libeufin/iso20022.rst b/libeufin/iso20022.rst index 7fc0c4d1..e45222a5 100644 --- a/libeufin/iso20022.rst +++ b/libeufin/iso20022.rst @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Reasons for not using ISO 20022 directly are: to JSON, they are difficult to use due to their verbosity. 3. Underspecification. Messages like camt.05x leave many "degrees of freedom" when translating the underlying data into a message. -4. No interoperability. As a result of underspecification, different countries/organisations +4. No interoperability. As a result of underspecification, different countries/organizations define their own subset and interpretation rules for ISO 20022 messages. This can lead to even contradictory usage rules. An example for this is how the Swiss and EPC interpretations handle transaction amounts in the presence of multiple currencies. -- cgit v1.2.3