From 275de898eeff924b0658adbbc3cd51cadcd749d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:36:05 -0500 Subject: fix typo: s/ingres/ingress/ --- design-documents/011-auditor-db-sync.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'design-documents') diff --git a/design-documents/011-auditor-db-sync.rst b/design-documents/011-auditor-db-sync.rst index 505f7b49..f4befdfa 100644 --- a/design-documents/011-auditor-db-sync.rst +++ b/design-documents/011-auditor-db-sync.rst @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ Drawbacks is the answer, to be investigated what performs better. * A malicious exchange could theoretically send expensive transactions to the auditor via the replication mechanism (possibly ones that - it did not even execute locally itself) to DoS the "ingres" + it did not even execute locally itself) to DoS the "ingress" database. This would be noticed primarily by load monitoring or even the auditor lagging unusually far behind the exchange's transaction history. We believe this is acceptable, -- cgit v1.2.3