From f29c8456f2d75673523a72682af5c8b877167721 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Dold Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 14:56:47 +0200 Subject: clarify Q/A --- design-documents/013-peer-to-peer-payments.rst | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/design-documents/013-peer-to-peer-payments.rst b/design-documents/013-peer-to-peer-payments.rst index 1724605a..6c87df9b 100644 --- a/design-documents/013-peer-to-peer-payments.rst +++ b/design-documents/013-peer-to-peer-payments.rst @@ -400,9 +400,11 @@ Q / A * Q: Why do merchant payments not use purses? - * A: Refunds aren't possible with purses, the customer can't prove that - they own the contract terms (contract terms claiming isn't interactive). + * Refunds aren't possible with purses after they're closed + * Partial refunds aren't possible + * the customer can't prove that they own the contract terms (contract terms claiming isn't interactive) + * the merchant can't cover deposit fees + * (All of these could be addressed, but the resulting protocol isn't necessarily simpler + than what we currently have.) - * All these issues could be addressed though. But that - would be a major "Taler 2.0 / 3.0" protocol change -- cgit v1.2.3