From c774dc31988d8a3205a08968c1794f6589b9af06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jagannath Bhat Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 23:12:09 +0530 Subject: doc: address bits of proof reading work PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/23978 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt Reviewed-By: James M Snell Reviewed-By: Rich Trott --- GOVERNANCE.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/GOVERNANCE.md b/GOVERNANCE.md index 40ef6e7bbe..da6706e87f 100644 --- a/GOVERNANCE.md +++ b/GOVERNANCE.md @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ be accepted unless: * Discussions and/or additional changes result in no Collaborators objecting to the change. Previously-objecting Collaborators do not necessarily have to - sign-off on the change, but they should not be opposed to it. + sign off on the change, but they should not be opposed to it. * The change is escalated to the TSC and the TSC votes to approve the change. This should only happen if disagreements between Collaborators cannot be resolved through discussion. @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ The meeting chair is responsible for ensuring that minutes are taken and that a pull request with the minutes is submitted after the meeting. Due to the challenges of scheduling a global meeting with participants in -several timezones, the TSC will seek to resolve as many agenda items as possible +several time zones, the TSC will seek to resolve as many agenda items as possible outside of meetings using [the TSC issue tracker](https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues). The process in the issue tracker is: @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ completed within a month after the nomination is accepted. ## Consensus Seeking Process -The TSC follows a [Consensus Seeking][] decision making model as described by +The TSC follows a [Consensus Seeking][] decision-making model as described by the [TSC Charter][]. [collaborators-discussions]: https://github.com/orgs/nodejs/teams/collaborators/discussions -- cgit v1.2.3